Multi-Criteria Evaluation Of Student Career Readiness Using An Intelligent Topsis-Based Decision Support System
Abstract
The assessment of student career readiness requires a systematic approach that considers multiple competencies and experiences relevant to workplace demands. This study develops an intelligent decision support system based on the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to evaluate and map student career readiness. The study uses 20 student samples and five assessment criteria: field-specific competence (C1), internship experience (C2), communication skills (C3), digital literacy (C4), and English language proficiency (C5). Each criterion is assigned a weight based on its relative importance. The TOPSIS method involves decision matrix construction, normalization, weighted normalization, determination of positive and negative ideal solutions, distance calculation, and preference value calculation. The results show that Y11 achieved the highest preference value of 0.8296, followed by Y6 (0.7951), Y19 (0.7274), Y5 (0.7116), and Y2 (0.6999), while Y9 obtained the lowest preference value of 0.3112. Based on the classification results, 1 student (5%) was categorized as Highly Ready, 5 students (25%) as Ready, 12 students (60%) as Moderately Ready, and 2 students (10%) as Not Ready. These findings demonstrate that TOPSIS can effectively rank and classify student career readiness based on multiple assessment criteria. The proposed system can support higher education institutions in identifying students’ readiness levels and developing more objective, targeted, and data-driven career development strategies.
Keywords
Views & Downloads Statistics (Last 12 Months)
References
17 References-
[1]Agustin, D., Yoenanto, N. H., & Andriani, F. (2025). Determinants of work readiness among Indonesian university students: A systematic literature review in the era of Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 10(4), 290–305. https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i04.36662
-
[2]Hidayat, R., & Amran, M. N. (2025). A mediating role of emotional intelligence between digital and employability skills among agricultural education students. SAGE Open, 15(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251385479
-
[3]Imjai, N., Chansamran, S., Sungthong, S., Usman, B., & Aujirapongpan, S. (2025). Developing employability digital competencies of Thai Gen Z business students: The role and matter of digital learning environments and digital adaptation skills. The International Journal of Management Education, 23(3), 101219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2025.101219
-
[4]Musa, S., Nurhayati, S., & Boriboon, G. (2025). The effect of internships on graduates’ employability, soft skills, and digital competence. Educational Process: International Journal, 17, e2025306. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.17.306
-
[5]Nuriani, D., Syifahayati, N., Farida, V. N., Rahmawati, D., Widianto, A. R., Karyanti, & Solikin, A. (2025). Student career readiness from an industrial guidance and counseling perspective in higher education. Suluh: Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling, 11(Spesial-1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.33084/suluh.v11iSpesial-1.12328
-
[6]Ishak, R., Suryaditya, R., Nur Khasanah, S., & Handayani, P. (2025). Penentuan mahasiswa terbaik dengan menggunakan metode TOPSIS (Teknik Urutan Preferensi Berdasarkan Kesamaan dengan Solusi Ideal). Infotek: Jurnal Informatika dan Teknologi, 8(2), 554–562. https://doi.org/10.29408/jit.v8i2.30601
-
[7]Rianto, W., Suherdi, D., S. Kom, M. Kom, & Gilang Suryanata, M. (n.d.). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menentukan Sekolah Menengah Atas (SMA) Terbaik pada Kabupaten Aceh Tenggara dengan Menggunakan Metode Weighted Product. J. CyberTech J. [Online]. Available: https://ojs.trigunadharma.ac.id/
-
[8]Irawan, M. D. (2017). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menentukan Matakuliah Pilihan pada Kurikulum Berbasis KKNI Menggunakan Metode Fuzzy Sugeno. J. Media Infotama, 13(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.37676/jmi.v13i1.435
-
[9]Rizki, S. N. (2018). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menentukan Tenaga. Jurnal Edik Informatika, 2.
-
[10]Yusran, R. R., et al. (2024). Strategi Pemasaran Produk untuk Meningkatkan Omset Perusahaan Menggunakan Sistem Pengambilan Keputusan, 7(6), 1946–1956.
-
[11]Fauziyah, F., Lestari, D., Rinayanti, M., & Zulkarnain, I. (2025). Multi-criteria decision analysis using TOPSIS method for scholarship recipients selection: A comprehensive implementation study. Jurnal SITECH: Sistem Informasi dan Teknologi, 8(1).
-
[12]Hts, D. I. G., Desi, E., Aliyah, S., Nasution, F. P., Indriani, U., & Edi, F. (2024). Decision support system using the TOPSIS method in new teacher selection. Sinkron: Jurnal dan Penelitian Teknik Informatika, 8(3), 1706–1714.
-
[13]Yudhistira, A., Wang, J., Rahmanto, Y., & Setiawansyah, S. (2024). Decision support system for optimizing supplier selection using TOPSIS and entropy weighting methods. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Teknologi Indonesia, 4(5), 175–185.
-
[14]Dharmawan, D. (2024). Application of TOPSIS method to design a decision support system in assessing teachers performance. Jurnal Informasi dan Teknologi, 6(1), 64–69.
-
[15]Irawati, Sugiarti, Hayati, L. N., Herman, Tawetubun, S. S., & Ahmad, N. A. S. S. (2026). Penerapan Decision Support System (DSS) menggunakan metode TOPSIS untuk seleksi mahasiswa berprestasi. Jurnal Algoritma, 23(1), 462–473.
-
[16]Meye, S. M., & Nguema, P. F. (2026). An improved TOPSIS model based on weighted generalized Mahalanobis distance for multi-attribute decision-making in water reservoir operations. Water Resources Management, 40.
-
[17]Wang, J., Setiawansyah, Palupiningsih, P., & Susanti, M. N. I. (2026). Comparative analysis of objective weighting methods and TOPSIS in multi-criteria decision making. JUSIFO (Jurnal Sistem Informasi), 12(1).
