The Implementation Of Authentic Assessment In English Language Teaching

Authors

  • Ayu Sundari 1 Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palangka Raya
  • Sabarun 2 Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palangka Raya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59435/jipnas.v1i2.70

Keywords:

implementation, authentic assessment, English language

Abstract

This study aims to compare four types of authentic assessment in an educational context: project assessment, portfolio assessment, written assessment, and performance assessment. The research method used is library research. The research findings show that authentic assessment is effective in promoting deep concept understanding and application of knowledge in real situations. Project assessment provides students with opportunities to integrate skills and knowledge in tasks relevant to the real world. Portfolio assessment allows students to reflect on their development holistically through a collection of work. Simulation assessments give students the experience of applying knowledge in a structured context. Case study assessments develop critical thinking skills in complex situations. In conclusion, educators need to consider learning objectives and student characteristics in choosing the appropriate type of authentic assessment. This research provides practical guidance for educators in designing effective assessments that motivate students. The results of this study encourage further discussion and research on the development of authentic assessment methods in education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Darong, H. C., Niman, E. M., Fatwamati, F., & Nendi, F. (2022). Implementasi Penilaian Otentik oleh Guru Bahasa Inggris di Flores. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 7(1), 65-77.

Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge University Press.

Arifin, M. N. (2016). Penilaian Otentik dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris. Saintifika Islamica: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman, 3(01), 111-130.

Villarroel, V., Bloxham, S., Bruna, D., Bruna, C., & Herrera-Seda, C. (2018). Authentic assessment: creating a blueprint for course design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), 840-854.

Zed, M. (2008). Metode penelitian kepustakaan. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Davis, M. H., & Ponnamperuma, G. G. (2005). Portfolio assessment. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 32(3), 279-284.

Larkin, T. (2014). The student conference: A model of authentic assessment

Ningsih, R. S., & Wahyumiani, N. (2020). Evaluating the implementation of authentic assessments in junior high school English lesson. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 24(1), 116-124.

Saputri, I., Nurkamto, J., & Wahyuni, D. S. (2019). The implementation of authentic assessment in English language teaching. English Education, 6(3), 270-277.

Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teaching and teacher education, 16(5-6), 523-545.

Zaim, M., & Arsyad, S. (2020). Authentic Assessment for Speaking Skills: Problem and Solution for English Secondary School Teachers in Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 587-604.

Aliningsih, F., & Sofwan, A. (2015). ENGLISH TEACHERS’PERCEPTIONS AND PRACTICES OF AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT. Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature, 10(1).

Sani, R. A. (2022). Penilaian autentik. Bumi Aksara.

Abdillah, F. M., Sulton, S., & Husna, A. (2021). Implementasi Penilaian Autentik dalam Kurikulum 2013. JKTP: Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan, 4(1), 41-50.

Friantary, H., & Martina, F. (2018). Evaluasi implementasi penilaian hasil belajar berdasarkan kurikulum 2013 oleh guru bahasa inggris dan bahasa indonesia di mts ja-alhaq kota bengkulu. Silampari Bisa: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, Daerah, Dan Asing, 1(2), 264-283.

Darong, H. C., Niman, E. M., Fatwamati, F., & Nendi, F. (2022). Implementasi Penilaian Otentik oleh Guru Bahasa Inggris di Flores. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 7(1), 65-77.

Ermawati, S., & Hidayat, T. (2017). Penilaian autentik dan relevansinya dengan kualitas hasil pembelajaran (persepsi dosen dan mahasiswa ikip pgri bojonegoro). Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Sosial, 27(1), 92-103.

Kurniati, N., & Khaliq, A. (2019, September). Penilaian sikap, pengetahuan dan keterampilan dalam pembelajaran bahasa Inggris yang berorientasi kurikulum 2013. In Seminar Nasional Taman Siswa Bima (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 309-316).

Agustini, L. I. (2016). Model Pembelajaran Kolaboratif dan asesmen autentik pada pembelajaran bahasa Inggris. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 7(2), 86-94.

Alim, H. S. (2019). Penilaian Autentik: Penerapan dan Dampak Kualitas Hasil Belajar Terhadap Mata Kuliah Bahasa Inggris. Jurnal Bahasa Inggris Terapan, 5(2), 91-103.

Inayah, N., Komariah, E., & Nasir, A. (2019). The practice of authentic assessment in an EFL speaking classroom. Studies in English Language and Education, 6(1), 152-162.

Koh, K. H. (2017). Authentic assessment. In Oxford research encyclopedia of education.

Huang, R., & Jiang, L. (2021). Authentic assessment in Chinese secondary English classrooms: teachers’ perception and practice. Educational Studies, 47(6), 633-646

Qu, W., & Yang, S. (2010). A peer and self-assessment project implemented in practical group work. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(6), 776.

Rukmini, D., & Saputri, L. A. D. E. (2017). The authentic assessment to measure students’ English productive skills based on 2013 curriculum. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 263-273..

Published

2023-08-01

How to Cite

The Implementation Of Authentic Assessment In English Language Teaching. (2023). Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Nasional (JIPNAS), 1(2), 83-88. https://doi.org/10.59435/jipnas.v1i2.70

Similar Articles

1-10 of 15

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.